Dog Ear
High baud (DOG EAR) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 23 August 2018 00:00

’m a storyteller. I love stories, how they are put together, how points are emphasized, how they wind around to a conclusion. But I noticed a strange thing the other day in the office.

I used to work with middle-aged Indian women and men of roughly my age. I could tell stories and outside of some of my creative uses of language, everything was fine. But most of those folks are gone now and in their places we have a wave of millennials. Now, don’t get me wrong – I’m not here to bust them along the typical lines. They live in a different world than I grew up in and hence they are different people. Yet I didn’t know how different they were until I told stories and came to a realization.

All that scene-setting and plot creation, all that is lost to them. They move faster, jumping to the point. They are it in, not for the communal spirit of the story itself but for the punchline. This is even evident in their misuse of “Irony”. Irony is defined as the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect. It means that you have to use language to set up one case, then topple it with another. It does not mean you are mocking generations past by lampooning them. But the setup for true irony takes time, and millennials want it now. So they toss out an instantaneous image of the past world, something that can be accomplished in a second or two. It might be funny, but it isn’t ironic.

To my point, for their own reasons, under their own environments and mental conditioning, they don’t have the patience for a story. It doesn’t mean the same thing that it does to me. But that means that, as a story-teller, trying to get in touch with the market, I may start need to consider this. Just as we’ve seen internet shockwaves go through the publishing field, we might start seeing changes to our stories. Perhaps, as authors, we need to consider shorter chapters, more catch-up phrasing (i.e. reintroducing characters for the put-it-down-pick-it-up readership), tighter descriptions and less-verbose styles. Just as the writers of the 1700s and 1800s could gently introduce characters over hundreds of pages, now we have possibly a page, maybe even a paragraph, to do so. Captain Ahab thundered and quaked. Now, maybe, he needs to make a mission-statement, getting down to whale-hunting in earnest with full CGI backgrounds.

This might not be the sort of world we writers wish to be in. We want audience and elbow room, and many, many blank pages to fill. But if we’re going to be popular, if we’re going to match word vs need, possibly we’ll have to change our styles to match our writer styles to reader styles.

>>>I WRITE WHAT I LIKE. READ MY CAREFULLY DEVELOPED AND FLESHED-OUT ANCIENT WORLDS HERE!<<<

 
Jealousy (DOG EAR) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 16 August 2018 00:00

’m pretty open with admissions – when I feel something I’ll note it here. I look at my blog as a personal diary at times (with the idea that I’m leaving it out for others to read). It seems to work best that way.

So I’ll admit this – I just finished the first book from an author and rather enjoyed it. I won’t say who but the review should be up soon.

I only had access to that one – it came off my dad’s shelf. But I decided to look online and see if he ever wrote anything else. I found that he’s continued his series, out four or five books now.

My first emotion was jealousy.

There, I said it.

See, where you (as readers) might be happy to find there were several more books of the series to enjoy, me, I feel annoyance over this (there, I said it again). See, I had the same deal going with my publishing house. I was already halfway through my next historical fiction and had figured out a great series to embark on, one about a young boy who gets swept into the Assyrian army and begins his career as a charioteer. I was billed as the “rising star” of historic fiction and was even considering if I’d possibly leave my day job. And then the publisher died, the house collapsed and everything was in ruins.

I still write. I’ve got a fan base online, a jot down whatever stories come to mind and don’t sweat publishing. If I manage to retire at years end, maybe I’ll even get back into writing. But that doesn’t mean (if we’re being honest) that I can’t look back to those exciting times and wonder what it would have been like to suddenly be the writer I’d trained to be. It’s a little hard to put on a casual face over the twisting visage of disappointment (and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t) and not dwell on it.

One looks at one’s cards and plays as one will.

So I keep blogging and keep writing. Maybe Indigo, someday. Or Tubitz and Merganstien. We’ll see.

A friend pointed out that China Miéville has a new book out.

Dammit.

>>>I DON’T CARE – I’M STILL SELLING BOOKS. CHECK OUT MY HISTORIC FICTION HERE!<<<

Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 August 2018 18:12
 
Intruders (DOG EAR) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 09 August 2018 00:00

kay, I ran a little experiment a week ago.

You see, when I got Joomla (which this site runs on) I noticed they didn’t have a feedback mechanism. How cool it would be, I though, to have discussions about the various books I’d read, to have people chime in if they liked my recommendations or not. So I added an app to my site that would allow me to get feedback per each article, and allow discussions to ferment around them.

And I did get some discussions – that was great. I also got some authors commenting on my site (mostly thanking me about my feedback, well, except for that one guy). But then, as is common with humanity, the bots and Ukrainian hackers found me. Turns out that app was not as good as I thought it was.

I was okay with cleaning out occasional span shit that would show up, one or two, here and there. But then I got contacted by my host service. My site was now being used to launch denial of service attacks. This meant I had to pull it down and get help in updating it. So that was a lot of money to clean up, and it pretty much pissed me off.

Back online, now the spam postings were coming in pretty consistent, ten a day. I’d dutifully clean them out. But the charm was gone with this idea. Eventually I just shut that service down. Since I post on Facebook, I can get comments there. Yes, it sucks that I can’t have authors chat with me about their works, but it also sucks to be a tool to be used to bring down corporate sites.

Recently I ran an experiment. I used to get lively discussions around my model train postings. Why not just turn it on for that? So I did. I let it run for a week, got one true comment and thirteen shit postings (all in one day). So that’s that, I figure. I shut the feedback option down for good. It’s like those bill-posters who’d stick paper advertisements on Nelson’s column – it’s hard to have great art when there are capitalists about.

If you have anything to say about this, or anything else I post, you can always reach me via my FACEBOOK book page.

Sorry, but if you want Ukrainian pornography, you’ll have to go elsewhere.

>>>MY OWN HOT LINKS TO HOT DEALS ARE ALWAYS POSTED, OF COURSE. YOU CAN GET MY BOOKS HERE!<<<

 
Scheduled (DOG EAR) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 01 August 2018 20:34

like the site Webtoons.com. There are thousands of strips and generally I can find a handful that I really enjoy. As long as the art is fairly decent and the story not too formulaic (how many zombie apocalypse toons can there be?), I’ll try it. Windbreaker, Space Boy, and My Giant Nerd Boyfriend are just a few of my favorites.

One thing that bumps items off my watchlist is consistency. For example, Seed is a brilliantly illustrated story about a young troubled girl who is befriended (in an ominous way) by a rogue AI. I really like it. It’s sharp and fresh and new. But the problem (which I didn’t notice at first) was that it was also irregular. This doesn’t show up when you are reading strip-to-strip, bingeing your way through them. But when you run out, there you sit, waiting for something to come in. A week passes. Another. Checking a non-changing front-page can cool interest. I’m hardly checking it these days.

When I started DOG EAR and my review column, I originally posted when I saw fit. But then I took a lesson off Webtoons. People will check back on a specific day for your content, sure enough. But make them come by and don’t have anything for a week or more, and then you’ll lose them. Which is why, no matter how tired and bothered I am, I always make a solid attempt to post something – anything – up. You might remember my stirring review of Green Eggs and Ham the other week. With Reamde taking up all my free time, there wasn’t much I could do. I had to review something that Sunday. And yes, drilling through that book when I was a young non-published, I could recite it from rote. And I could review it handily.

So that’s my suggestion – if you have a blog that talks about your works or progress or even your hobbies (even kittens), do your best to hold to a firm schedule. Your casual readers will thank you for it.

>>>ANOTHER CONSISTANT THING – MY LINK TO MY WORKS. CLICK HERE TO SEE MY BOOKS AND MAYBE EVEN BUY ONE!<<<

 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 3 of 83